| PROBLEMS | SOLUTIONS |
| 1.) There is a misunderstanding of what is needed to identify a voice in an audio track. | 1.) Forensic Voice or Speaker Identification needs at least two audio files. One audio file should be of a known person to be compared with audio files with an unknown person. We offer Audio Enhancement and audio isolation from a video recording, but most importantly we create comparative analysis to determine if the person speaking in audio files is the same person or not. |
| 2.) Multiple terminologies are being used to name Forensic Voice Identification. Some may call it ‘Speaker Analysis’, ‘Voice Identification’, ‘Speaker Identification’ and more. Multiple terms make searches for expert witnesses challenging. | 2.) The solution is here. Forensic Digital Audio. |
| 3.) Some voice identification experts miss details by listening in a bad environment and by using equipment that adds unwanted frequencies when listening to an audio track. | 3.) We handle track analysis in a sound studio using reference monitors that do not add frequencies. In most cases we can also enhance an audio file to be more understandable. We can also separate an audio file from a Video or Film recording in order to analyze. Call us to learn more. |
| 4.) Some expert witnesses do not have ears trained to hear differences of timber and or frequencies, when there are scientific studies proving trained musicians have better abilities to hear minute differences needed. | 4.) Forensic Digital Audio uses only trained musicians who are skilled in catching subtle nuances. |
| 5.) There is a need for scientific reports to be understandable by the average lay person and or jury. | 5.) At Forensic Digital Audio our reports are written to be easily understandable while explaining the terms used. Our transcriptions read like a movie script, making it easy to follow. Our Voice Analysis Reports include spectralgraph visuals where you can see the differences and those differences are explained. Our reports point out findings and includes graphs to show comparisons of tracks, all while explaining terminologies, techniques and science to back up our statements. |
| 6.) There is a glut of tracks needing audio comparative analysis. | 6.) Forensic Digital Audio can tackle the glut of tracks of unknown voices. |
| 7.) There is a huge need of an impartial comparative process that is based on science and fulfills all the afore mentioned issues. | 7.) Forensic Digital Audio has an impartial process that has proven successful. |
